1
1 Comment

Opinion... writing meta descriptions is (mostly) a waste of time

Agree or disagree – and if so, why?

My reasoning:

  • Google will, more often than not, ignore your beautifully optimised meta description and rewrite it based on a user's specific search / what generates the best CTR.

  • Searchers almost certainly don't read them

  • The very fact Google ignores them a lot of time shows they're not an important ranking factor.

  • Writing "a good meta" is actually quite time consuming

Exceptions:

  • It's still important for major landing pages, such as your homepage and (sometimes) top-level navigation pages.
  1. 1

    Disagree.

    I don't think that people should spend as much time as they tend do (meta descriptions are not a ranking factor, and people obsess over them).

    But Google will bold search terms if they appear in the meta description so I can be an opportunity to stand out if you understand what search terms the page will rank for.

    Writing a good meta description does not need to be time consuming - write a 1-2 sentence teaser for the page and make it keyword rich. It can be done in 5 minutes and ought to be part of the publishing process.

    Google does re-write meta descriptions, so you have a point there - but it doesn't no harm to give Google a head start by providing a meta description you wrote.

Trending on Indie Hackers
Passed $7k 💵 in a month with my boring directory of job boards 56 comments How I got 1,000+ sign-ups in less than a month with social media alone 20 comments 87.7% of entrepreneurs struggle with at least one mental health issue 14 comments How to Secure #1 on Product Hunt: DO’s and DON'Ts / Experience from PitchBob – AI Pitch Deck Generator & Founders Co-Pilot 13 comments Competing with a substitute? 📌 Here are 4 ad examples you can use [from TOP to BOTTOM of funnel] 10 comments Are you wondering how to gain subscribers to a founder's X account from scratch? 9 comments